So smooth yet so effective in cutting those whiskers down to skin level. First time use of the Wizamet Iridium Super in this razor and it was eye opening. Easy cutting with enough audible sounds to tell one clearly that it was doing some serious cutting. 95 first on the right and just let it drop. The table was set, the lather was ready and it was on as both these razors were taking on 2 days growth. Criteria is simple with performance (cutting ability within each pass in efficiency or effectiveness), comfort (the ease of feel on the skin in connection with how it feels in hand as balance and ease of movement plays a big roll in overall comfort in what is occurring during the shave) and quality of shave which encompasses whether there was or wasn’t any irritation, nics, cuts or weepers encountered during the shave process.Ĭold morning so, I went with Wholly Kaw Project leather for the suds and splash and installed fresh new Wizamet blades in each razor. It’s just a normal shave with your senses tuned up for feel & sound. Nothing special or getting a Zen like quality moment or concentration. Each razor gets a side of the face and you just get in tune with the nature of the shave and searching for differences. How did it do it? Read on.Īs always, my shaves are a 3 pass affair when I’m pitting mano a mano shave tool face offs just to get a full shave in and really get to feel the differences between each razor. And personally, I was shocked at how good of a showing it rendered. 5 Slim SS? Can it hang with a tool that cost 3 times as much and is equally as crafted that provides smooth, efficient and consistently great results nearly every time out? In a word, yes. razors in the “luxury division” when a shaver wants to upgrade or consider an heirloom quality tool in a Stainless Steel alloy. Personally, I consider the Timeless SS variants to be arguably the best 3 pc. Both razors are very efficient while retaining very good comfort and skin feel during one’s shave. 95 version while retaining near identical shave feel & comfort. 5 Slim to provide just the slightest increase in blade feel over the. It carries a thinner head height from base plate to top cap with a slight change in shave geometry that encompasses blade reveal & exposure. I’ve had it since its first release and I consider it to be an excellent shaver on par with the Timeless. Perhaps I’ll link this post to a Timeless thread as well for Timeless followers for good measure. I apologize to the OP as I know this thread is mainly for the RR Lupo series and relevant discussions about its abilities in wet shave world. So, I wanted to do a quick shave comparison between these two without having to start a new thread as there are many that follow here. I thought I had done a shave off between the two and apparently I have not. I was asked by a fellow forum member what my thoughts were on the. Regardless, in my humble opinion, I find it to be an extremely well crafted razor with tolerances and performance to go neck and neck with some of the more expensive and “luxury” brand razors out there. Helping of salt always needed in whatever razor thread you may follow) of a tool. 95 Lupo too mild of a shaver and perhaps for their particular beard it could possibly be. In whatever configuration that fellow members have tried it in, it has garnered well deserved praise & accolades from the masses or the far majority with a few reports from some that found the series either too aggressive or too mild (yes, I’ve read from those whom have considered the. 95 from another thread just for conversations sake.įor those that follow the RR Lupo thread you have heard me sing its praises for the tremendously affordable yet stout performer that the Lupo is. Thought I’d post a shave off between the Timeless.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |